In article , "Larry Lamb"
 wrote:

That should be without preempt

> With
> preempt the secondary would have to go down for the original primary to
> take over.  I hope this makes sense.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3305&t=3291
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to