Order the 1750-4v as it's the cheapest route to get the DSPs and DRAM/Flash
upgrades you need.  You still need FXO/FXS modules depending on your config.

#show version
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C1700 Software (C1700-NOSV3Y-M), Version 12.0(5)XQ1, EARLY
DEPLOYMENT RELEASE SOF
TWARE (fc1)
TAC:Home:SW:IOS:Specials for info
Copyright (c) 1986-1999 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Tue 23-Nov-99 11:07 by sharpd
Image text-base: 0x80008088, data-base: 0x8083597C

ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.0(3)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
ROM: C1700 Software (C1700-NOSV3Y-M), Version 12.0(5)XQ1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT
RELEASE SOFTWAR
E (fc1)

BFGC-SJC-1750-1 uptime is 2 days, 21 hours, 17 minutes
System returned to ROM by power-on at 01:04:01 PDT Tue Apr 10 2001
System restarted at 12:12:50 PDT Mon Apr 30 2001
System image file is "flash:c1700-nosv3y-mz.120-5.XQ1.bin"

cisco 1750 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x601) with 24576K/8192K bytes of
memory.
Processor board ID JAD04420C04 (2869480179), with hardware revision 0000
M860 processor: part number 0, mask 32
Bridging software.
X.25 software, Version 3.0.0.
1 FastEthernet/IEEE 802.3 interface(s)
1 Serial network interface(s)
2 Voice FXS interface(s)
WIC T1-DSU
32K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
8192K bytes of processor board System flash (Read/Write)

Here is a replacement order for a "DOA" batch of 1750s that were
manafuctured with defects (won't work with FXS modules without screeching
when they go off-hook):
>Parts Ordered:
> CISCO1750; Qty: 2; Desc: CISCO1750, 10/100 MODULAR ROUTER W/1VIC,
> 2WIC/VIC SLOTS,CISC
> MEM1700-8MFC=; Qty: 2; Desc: MEM1700-8MFC=, CISCO 1700 8MB
> MINI-FLASH CARD
> MEM1700-16D=; Qty: 2; Desc: MEM1700-16D=, CISCO 1700 16MB DRAM DIMM
> PVDM-8=; Qty: 2; Desc: PVDM-8=, 8-CHANNEL PACKET VOICE/FAX DSP MODULE
> SWF; Qty: 2; Desc: SWF, SOFTWARE

Beware of getting a 1750 with the following as it will have this same "DOA"
defect (nice of Cisco not to recall these that were shipped as a 1750-4v,
which means the customer *will* be using them with voice at some point):
>From TAC:
"Jason, the suspect chassis are between datecodes 0435 through 0448, and as
a result the SLO chassis would also fall between this range. I've only seen
cases where the defect is catastrophic however, and as you have seen in the
other two chassis you can't even get a clear dialtone. That being said, it
is possible that the SLO chassis has a low-severity form of this defect."

The nice TAC engineer immediately opened an RMA to get them replaced.  Cisco
RMA people pulled in some crap saying we have to go back to our "Tire 2"
supplier (TechData) to get them RMA'd, but they're past 90 days, so good
f'ing luck.  I don't know where this is exactly, but last I heard it was
still bouncing around (the customer is probably going to get stuck buying
SmartNET's for all of them to get their new "DOA" routers replaced so they
actually work with VoIP).

Nice crappy service on this one, but TAC held up their end, just not Cisco
RMA.  Details to follow when I find out what happens.  Sorry, this whole
thing really has me PO'd at Cisco.  Basically, don't sell a router without a
SmartNET contract as there is no Lemon Law for them ;-p

--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+
List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/



""Fanglo""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> I'm confused with 1750, from cisco web site I know that in order to
> config voice I need a 1750 with DSP, the question is anyone know how to
> distinguish the router is DSP enabled just with sh ver?
>
> TIA
>
> Fanglo
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=4364&t=4343
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to