(Kevin) Your kidding right, that was hillarious!!! Personally I don't think IIS5 should be on a dedicated box, instead it should be Apache on a E250 minimum. (Group)I was trying to be quiet for a few days with all this anti- (Quasi)flame rhetoric goin-on. Please forgive me, my new leaf just floated away, hope I'm not using too much bandwidth though. Previous scolders need not reply. Don ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin O'Gilvie" To: Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 12:10 PM Subject: Windows 2000 Server Architechture/ Data Organization [7:5310] > Hi Everyone, > > I am in the process of reorginizing this my network, Prior to me everything > was just put everywhere and I need to come up with a full proof plan. My > questions are: > > -For a 60 user enviorment how many servers do I need to run Active Directory > on, Should AD be on a dedicated box? > > -How should I organize data, (users / corp data/ Fin Data) What restrictions > should I put on these shares? > > -DNS, Wins, DHCP, Exchange, SQL, IIS5, Inoculate, Backup Exec, Print > Services, .... What should be on dedicated boxes what shouldnt? > > TIA, > > Kevin > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5325&t=5325 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]