I thought a peer was someplace one went to fish or launch boats. My brother does a lot of networking at the local peer. Or maybe it's the name of a ballet? Peer Gynt? Isn't two of something a peer? Something I never see, which is why my friends like playing poker with me ( ok, that's really stretching the pun. Sorry ) Chuck -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Donald B Johnson jr Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 1:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Server Architechture/ Data Organization [7:5337] peer n 1: a person who is of equal standing with another in a group [syn: equal, match, compeer] 2: (British) a nobleman (duke or marquis or earl or viscount or baron) who is a member of the British peerage v : look searchingly; "We peered into the back of the shop to see whether a salesman was around" Source: WordNet . 1.6, ) 1997 Princeton University so when you say peer do you mean someone who is in equal standing that asks microsoft questions on the cisco cert site -- peer n 1 -- or are you talking about Count Chocula for all your Microsoft needs. -- peer n 2 -- See I knew I'd get a Quasi-flame. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin O'Gilvie" To: ; Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 12:59 PM Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Server Architechture/ Data Organization [7:5310] > Donald, > > Sorry I wasnt kidding, maybe I am just not as advanced as you and look to > learn from taking advice from peers. Am I wrong for that. Stupid me.. > > Kevin > > > >From: "Donald B Johnson jr" > >To: "Kevin O'Gilvie" , > >Subject: Re: Windows 2000 Server Architechture/ Data Organization [7:5310] > >Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 15:49:20 -0700 > > > >(Kevin) Your kidding right, that was hillarious!!! Personally I don't think > >IIS5 should be on a dedicated box, instead it should be Apache on a E250 > >minimum. > >(Group)I was trying to be quiet for a few days with all this anti- > >(Quasi)flame rhetoric goin-on. Please forgive me, my new leaf just floated > >away, hope I'm not using too much bandwidth though. Previous scolders need > >not reply. > >Don > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Kevin O'Gilvie" > >To: > >Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 12:10 PM > >Subject: Windows 2000 Server Architechture/ Data Organization [7:5310] > > > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > I am in the process of reorginizing this my network, Prior to me > >everything > > > was just put everywhere and I need to come up with a full proof plan. My > > > questions are: > > > > > > -For a 60 user enviorment how many servers do I need to run Active > >Directory > > > on, Should AD be on a dedicated box? > > > > > > -How should I organize data, (users / corp data/ Fin Data) What > >restrictions > > > should I put on these shares? > > > > > > -DNS, Wins, DHCP, Exchange, SQL, IIS5, Inoculate, Backup Exec, Print > > > Services, .... What should be on dedicated boxes what shouldnt? > > > > > > TIA, > > > > > > Kevin > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5343&t=5343 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]