Is there something more recent than RFC 2740? Or earlier?
The RIPngv6 RFC 2080 looks like it was completed two years earlier than
OSPF.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Howard C. Berkowitz
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPv^ info from Cisco [7:5602]
>It appears that for routing protocols Cisco has only implented RIPv6
>and BGP for IPv6 in 12.2T. Is there any reason why they have chosen not
>to implement EIGRP for IPv6? It seems odd that in their first foray
>into IPv6 that they would exclude their own routing protocol of choice.
>
>John
Think about it. Aren't the early adopters for v6 likely to be
interested in multivendor interoperability?
Although I do hope to see OSPFv6 soon -- it has some backwards
compatibility, and solves a number of OSPFv2 limitations.
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5620&t=5602
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
