Hi Paul,

You were right!  Thanks for clearing that up for me.  I feel kind of silly
now because I think I was trying to make it more difficult than it was, but
it is nice to know the answer!

pet4006_8 (enable) sh cdp neigh
* - indicates vlan mismatch.
# - indicates duplex mismatch.
Port     Device-ID                       Port-ID                   Platform
-------- ------------------------------- -------------------------
------------
 1/1     SCA04230312(PETHOU-6509-02)     4/8                       WS-C6509
 1/2     SCA04230312(PETHOU-6509-02)     3/7                       WS-C6509
pet4006_8 (enable)
                         

Heather Buri   
CSC Technology Services - Houston

Phone:  (713)-961-8592
Fax:            (713)-961-8249
Mobile:         
Alpha Page:     

Mailing:        1360 Post Oak Blvd
                     Suite 500
                     Houston, TX 77056



-----Original Message-----
From: Williamson, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 12:45 PM
To: 'Buri, Heather H'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485]


Heather,
Its the received port id
You should find that port 1/2 is connected to the 6509 on a lower port than
port 1/1
do a sh cdp neigh to confirm

Hope this is correct
-Paul



-----Original Message-----
From: Buri, Heather H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 May 2001 18:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: question regarding spanning tree [7:6485]


Hello.

I don't really have a problem so much as I am trying to get a better
understanding of how Spanning Tree works.  I am currently studying for my
switching exam and am reviewing Spanning Tree.  I have the following
statement from the Cisco course manual and in the case of redundant paths to
the root bridge, it states "In order to choose which port will be forwarding
data and which ports will be blocking data, the switch looks at two
components in the BPDU, as follows:
 
1.  Path Cost

2.  Port ID

The switch looks at the path cost first to determine which port is receiving
the lowest cost path.  If the path cost is equal, as in the case of parallel
links, the bridge goes to the port ID as a "tie-breaker".  The port with the
lowest port ID forwards and all other ports block."

I decided to verify this on one of my 4006's which connects to my 6509
(which is the root) and here is what I found:

pet4006_8 (enable) sh spantree statistics 1/2 1
Port  1/2   VLAN 1

SpanningTree enabled for vlanNo = 1

                BPDU-related parameters
port spanning tree                   enabled
state                                forwarding
port_id                              0x8002
port number                          0x2
path cost                            4
message age (port/VLAN)              0(20)
designated_root                      00-d0-01-98-5c-00
designated_cost                      0
designated_bridge                    00-d0-01-98-5c-00
designated_port                      0x8087
top_change_ack                       FALSE
config_pending                       FALSE
port_inconsistency                   none

                PORT based information & statistics
config bpdu's xmitted (port/VLAN)    0(8702816)
config bpdu's received (port/VLAN)   831061(1662121)
tcn bpdu's xmitted (port/VLAN)       1(1)
pet4006_8 (enable) sh spantree statistics 1/1 1
Port  1/1   VLAN 1

SpanningTree enabled for vlanNo = 1

                BPDU-related parameters
port spanning tree                   enabled
state                                blocking
port_id                              0x8001
port number                          0x1
path cost                            4
message age (port/VLAN)              1(20)
designated_root                      00-d0-01-98-5c-00
designated_cost                      0
designated_bridge                    00-d0-01-98-5c-00
designated_port                      0x80c8
top_change_ack                       FALSE
config_pending                       FALSE
port_inconsistency                   none

However, as you can see from the above output, Port 1/2 is the port chosen
to forward and it appears to have a higher port ID number.  Can someone
please explain what I am missing here?

Thanks!

Heather Buri   
CSC Technology Services - Houston

Phone:  (713)-961-8592
Fax:            (713)-961-8249
Mobile:         
Alpha Page:     

Mailing:        1360 Post Oak Blvd
              Suite 500
              Houston, TX 77056



EOM 

NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the
addressee named above.  It may also be confidential and/or privileged.  If
you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified
that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it.
If you have received this message in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


PLEASE READ: The information contained in this e-mail is confidential
and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
recipient of this email you must not copy, distribute or take any
further action in reliance on it and you should delete it and notify the
sender immediately. Email is not a secure method of communication and
Nomura International plc cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy
or completeness of this message or any attachment(s). Please examine this
e-mail for virus infection, for which Nomura International plc accepts
no responsibility. If verification of this email is sought then please
request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated any views or opinions
presented are solely those of the author and do not represent those of
Nomura International plc. This email is intended for informational
purposes only and is not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell
securities or related financial instruments. Nomura International plc is
regulated by the Securities and Futures Authority Limited and is a
member of the London Stock Exchange.

EOM 

NOTICE - This message contains information intended only for the use of the
addressee named above.  It may also be confidential and/or privileged.  If
you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified
that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it.
If you have received this message in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6492&t=6485
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to