Hi; The fixed moduele will be slot 0. The NM module will be in slot 1. >From the configuration, you can tell. But I am not sure I am right. Feel free to discuss. Best Rgds; Vincent ""Sean Young"" Nate, > > Thank you very much for pointing that out. Now it does actually make > sense that the Ethernet > > port is assigned E0/0 (duh!). However, I still think it is a very stupid > way of Cisco for doing > > this. Where do you hear a fixed port that is also consider as a > "module". > > Once again, thanks for pointing that out. > > > > Sean > > >From: "Nate Van Maren" >Reply-To: "Nate Van Maren" >To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX > port? [7:6640] - Yes [7:6706] >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 22:29:17 -0400 > > >But your missing the point... The 2600 series routers has two slots... > >With a max of 32 lines per slot, add one and you get 65 for the aux... > Same >with a 3640, 4 slots 4x32+1 =129 for aux port... > >Now wait a > minute. I didn't say the 2600 has two NM slots. It has slot 0 >which is a > fixed lan interface config with two wic slots and slot 1, the NM >slot. > That is still two slots. > >from > >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis2600/net_ m > >od2/conntser.htm > >The interface number of a port is determined using > the following relation: > >interface-number = (32 x slot-number) + > unit-number + 1 > >Thanks >-The Nate > >"Sean Young" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > The max. number of > Async-line you can have on the NM for either 2600s or > > 3600s is > > > > > thirty-two (32). I couldn't find any NM that has 64 async-line for > > > either 2600s or 3600s > > > > routers. Therefore, the number 65 for AUX > is still a mystery to me. > > > > Sean > > > > >From: "Neil Schneider" > >Reply-To: "Neil Schneider" >To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: > Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX > > port? [7:6640] >Date: Thu, 31 > May 2001 21:16:49 -0400 > >The 2600 series > > only has one NM slot, but > you can buy NM modules with >different numbers > > of ports on them. > > >-- >Neil Schneider >MCT MCSE CCSI CCNP > > > > > > >""Sean Young"" wrote > in message > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > CM, > > > > > I don't > > know where you buy the Cisco 2600s router but from what I > can see > > in > > > > > > front of me, I have a Cisco 2610, Cisco 2611 > and another 2621, > > all of > > them only > > > > have 1 Network Module > (NM) slot. If you are > > referring to Cisco 3620 then > > I > > > > > might agree with you that > > Cisco 3620 has 2 NM slots. Please don't > give > > out > > > > wrong > > information unless you know it is > accurate. > > > > Anyone else would > > like to comment on this one. Am I > correct in this > > case? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Sean > > > > > >From: Charles Manafa >To: 'Sean Young ' , > > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED] '" > > > >Subject: RE: Can anyone shed the light on > > Cisco AUX port? > [7:6640] > > >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:27:29 +0100 > > > >Cisco 2600 is > a modular router > > like the 3600, and is capable of > > supporting >two > modules. Whether or not > > these slots are populated, it > > doesn't > change the >tty numbering, i.e slot > > 0: 0-31, slot 1: 32-64 > > etc. > As the AUX port is the >last tty + 1, the AUX > > port is 65 on a > > > 2600. > >CM > >-----Original Message----- >From: Sean > > Young >To: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 31/05/01 19:19 >Subject: Can > > anyone shed > > > the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > >I am hoping someone > > on > the > > group can explain to me the following >situation: I've noticed > > > that > > on the Cisco 2500s platform, the AUX port >is >listed on line > 1 > > (sine > > consoleport is on line 0). However, on Cisco >2600s > platform, the > > AUX > > port is listed on line 65(console port is still > >at line 0). On the > > > > cisco 3640 router, if I put my FE module in > slot 0, >thenthe AUX port is > > > > listed on line 129. If I put my FE > module in slot >3, >then the AUX > > port > > is listed on line 97. I > understand why that is the >case on > > Cisco 2500s > > and 3600s > platform, but apparently, the 2600s >platform > > is really out of > > > wack. Why doesn't Cisco make themconsistent >on >all > > platforms? I > work > > for an ISP shop and it is hard for me to new > > >network > engineering folks > > about this especially when it involves > > > >async-lines, AS5300, Radius > > andTACACS (you get the point). I guess > > > >when Cisco controls about 90% > > market share of the router market, > it > > >really doesn't give a f___ about > > these things. No wonder why > Juniper > > >andAvici >are kicking Cisco's ass in > > the carrier market > because it > > makes the >product moreuser-friendly (until > > it becomes > just as big as > > Cisco then >those guys will start acting > > > arrogant). An explaination > > from anyone in >this group is very > appreciate. > > Sean > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > http://explorer.msn.com > > > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure > violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > http://explorer.msn.com > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6759&t=6759 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
