1. with the 2509 or 2511, you still need modems
2. for the authentication piece, you can use RADIUS authentication against
your NT PDC user database. There might be a piece of software that you have
to download to get that mating - check Microsoft TechNet for details. (it's
included in MS2000 server)
-e-
----- Original Message -----
From: "NetEng"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: %@&*# RAS [7:6282]
> Please disregard the second question. I see that I must use a 3620. Anyone
> out there using it? How's it working? Thanks again.
>
> Collin
>
>
> ""NetEng"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Here is my dilemma. I need to implement a very reliable (and of course
> cost
> > efficient) RAS solution (currently using NT, no flames please) and
here's
> > what I'm looking at.
> >
> > Cisco 2509- I currently have 8 analog line coming from our PBX into our
> > existing RAS solution. Here's my first question and I'm sure a stupid
> > one....Do I still need modems? I can't find documentation
> anywhere.....After
> > looking at cisco's website they mention TACACS+ for authentication, I
have
> > ACS for NT. Will that work?
> >
> > Cisco 2620 w/4 Port BRI NM- I can slap another BRI card in our PBX and
get
> 4
> > BRI lines from it. Can I go directly into the 2620? ACS work here?
> >
> > I only need about 8 ports so an AS is overkill. Anybody dealt with this
> > before? Any suggestions welcome. Also looking at Portmaster, but would
> like
> > to stay cisco if possible. Thanks.
> >
> > Collin
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6972&t=6282
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
