You can't just do an IMA on any T1 controllers, you'll need IMA cards.
check links out:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/enatt1a1.htm

The following benefits are offered by the ATM T1/E1 IMA features for the 
Cisco 2600 and 3600 series routers:


High-bandwidth performance at a lower cost than T3 and E3


Internetworking design flexibility and scalability for LAN-to-WAN solutions


Migration path to high bandwidth without the need to change transport 
facilities


Efficient prioritization provided by the ATM architecture

Check this link too:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120t/120t5/atm_ima.htm#xtocid99554




>From: "tcb" 
>Reply-To: "tcb" 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Weird Scenario question [7:7590]
>Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 15:06:00 -0400
>
>************
>                              *          *
>                  Router1     *  RTR     *
>                              *          *
>                              ************
>                              | | |  | | |
>                              | | |  | | |
>           T-1 Lines -------> | | |  | | |
>                              | | |  | | |
>                              / / /  \ \ \
>                             / / /    \ \ \
>                            ******    ******
>                            *    *    *    *
>                  Router2   * RTR*    * RTR* Router3
>                            *    *    *    *
>                            ******    ******
>
>Ok I currently have 2 routers going to core router up above.  Both
>routers are running CEF.  And both are configured to run Load Balancing
>Per Packet. So packets are being distributed evenly across 3 T-1s on
>each side. Ok so now I am doing this at Layer 2. Customer currently had
>an idea put in their head about IMA (Inverse Multiplexing).  Well with
>IMA I will be taking 3 T-1s and making them look like one giant pipe,
>but it will fragment/Segment/chopup whatever you want to call it the
>traffic and ship the data across all 3 physical pipes in a round-robin
>fashion.  This is done at the SAR level, if I am not mistaken.  Layer 2
>again, Right?  What is the benefit to traffic?  Latency/Delay
>improvement?  Still have inherent delays of T-1s.  Anyone got any
>feedback or ideas?  Am I in left field.
>
>Tim
>
>A servant of my misfortune
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7620&t=7590
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to