We're looking at it from the view that it's only IP traffic that's
interesting as well, John. The IPX traffic should already be encapsulated by
then for use in the tunnel. As soon as our lab is not being used we'll check
it out. Thanks for your help.
Jim
--
James Haynes
Network Architect
Cendant IT
A+,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I've never configured this but I thought I'd take a stab at it anyway.
> My thinking is this: since IPX is not being routed directly across the
> ISDN link, then there is no need to place IPX traffic in the dialer
> list. You don't want IPX traffic to trigger the dialer, you want
> IP-tunneled IPX traffic to trigger it. So, configure the dialer list so
> that the IP tunnel itself is interesting and then utilize floating
> static routes or dialer watch to bring up the backup line. If the main
> line goes down, the router will still want to tunnel that traffic but it
> then knows it has to bring up the backup link to reach the opposite end
> of the tunnel.
>
> Regards,
> John
>
> >>> "James Haynes" 6/18/01 1:09:47 PM >>>
> I'm working on a situation where two routers are to be connected by a
> frame-relay connection. An ISDN dial-backup will be available. A
> tunnel
> interface has been created to bring IPX across the IP Backbone. My
> question
> involves the dialer-list on the BRI interface.
>
> When I'm defining interesting traffic for the list is the IPX traffic
> to be
> considered as interesting, or does the check for interesting traffic
> occur
> only after the IPX traffic has been encapsulated for use in the tunnel
> and
> thus, it is only IP traffic that should be examined? If the IPX traffic
> is
> to be looked at to define interesting traffic can more than one
> dialer-group
> be applied to the BRI interface in the same way that an interface can
> have
> more than one access-list as long as it's one per protocol, per
> direction?
> This way interesting IP or IPX traffic would bring up the backup ISDN
> line.
>
> --
> James Haynes
> Network Architect
> Cendant IT
> A+,MCSE,CCNA,CCDA,CCNP,CCDP
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9082&t=8982
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
