Re: Redundancy with 4908 [7:9757]

[Andr� Herkenrath]

I think you misunderstood me .
I don�t want to use a spanning tree.
Isn�t there a more sophisticated way to build a redundancy ?

Thanks 
A.Herkenrath


Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9772&t=9757
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]