Thanks to everyone for their feedback.  After Michael's post, I guess I'm
stuck with my 70... oh well.  Time to study for the Lab.

Also Michael:
Can you post a URL to CCSI cert info?  I can't find it on Cisco's website.
Also, if you care to, can you elaborate on your own personal  quest to teach
this stuff?

Nate




""Michael Bambic""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Well this should take a load off your mind, Cisco doesn't allow retakes
> for better scores and now the Vue testing software puts that rule into
> effect. We just got an Email from Vue at my place which is a Vue testing
> center concerning that very thing. Everybody thought I caused it because
> I took the CCNA again to get a better score to qualify for CCSI. I had
> never seen a no retake policy from Cisco but there it was from Vue.
> Luckily it was a Vue spam to every testing center and it wasn't me who
> caused the problem...
> :)
> At least I got a 978 on the retake, got a 914 first time around in 6
> minutes...
>
> Mike Bambic
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Peter Slow
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 7:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Passed the CCIE written by accident-should I retake?
> [7:9789]
>
>
> My honest reccomendation would be to study for it like you were going to
> take it again, and then not.
>
> study till you know you would ace it.
> (of course if you went and took it then, youd prolly only get a 90, but
> thats okay.) ...and then don't take it 'cause it costs 300 to take, and
> you've already passed it.
>
> Peter Slow, CCNP Voice Specialist
> Network Engineer
> Planetary Networks
> 535 West 34th. Street
> New York, New York
> 10001
>
> Cell: +1(516) 782.1535
> Desk: +1(646) 792.2395
> Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 2:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Passed the CCIE written by accident-should I retake?
> [7:9743]
>
>
> you have 18 months now to take yer first whiff at it, is that not enuff
> time??
>
>         Bri
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nate Vanderschaaf"
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 9:48 PM
> Subject: Passed the CCIE written by accident-should I retake? [7:9733]
>
>
> > Since I realized I would never feel ready for the CCIE, I figured the
> > best way to prepare for the CCIE written was to take it once, try to
> > get a feel for the subject material, topics and format, then go home,
> > study anything that was a total surprise, and take it again.  ($300
> > for the test, instead of $3000 for a class).  Trouble is, I passed the
>
> > test-- barely. I got a
> 70%,
> > the absolute minimum passing score.
> >
> > I realize the lab is challenging, and since it's at least 6 months out
>
> > for me (full schedule in NC and CA), I'm trying to figure out if
> > there's a
> good
> > reason to retake the written.  I did notice that you need to submit
> > your score when logging in to the Lab scheduling system.
> >
> >
> > BTW, I thought the CCIE written was too easy and too difficult at the
> > same time.  I really don't see the need to have memorized tons of
> > TokenRing bridging techniques in today's Ethernet world, but
> > concurrently, I would have liked to be more challenged with OSPF and
> > BGP questions, things that are critical to today's Internet world.  I
> > wonder how many people on this newsgroup realize that ARIN has allowed
>
> > backbone carriers to only
> advertise
> > /20 bits to BGP peers and how this threatens the integrity of the
> > 'net? (Also hats off to uu.net for continuing on with /24!  Damn you
> > sprint!)
> >
> >
> > Congratulations to anyone who has worked hard to learn
> > internetworking. Certified or not.
> >
> > Nate Vanderschaaf




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9926&t=9926
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to