I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "per destination load balancing". I'm
am new to Cisco products so some of the terminology is over my head. Could
you clarify this for me with the commands I would use? Thanks alot.
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Sure, you can do this. But why? Why not use per-destination load
> balancing instead of paying for an unused link? To achieve your goal,
> do exactly as you stated. Setting the AD higher on one of the static
> routes will do what you want.
>
> To answer the last question, if a directly connected interface goes
> down then all routes that exit that interface are immediately removed
> from the routing table. In the case of floating static routes, the
> change to the backup default will be instantaneous.
>
> HTH,
> John
>
> >>> "Sam Sneed" 6/26/01 11:08:32 AM >>>
> Currently my internet connection is a Cisco 4700 with 2 frame relay
> lines.
> We do load sharing by having 2 default routes through each link.
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0.1
> ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial1.1
> This works quite well but we only want to use one link and have the
> other
> for backup so our ISP will charge a lower rate. I also want to stay
> away
> from using routing protocols.(its a small network).
>
> Will this work:
> Assign a greater adminstrative distance to one of the default routes so
> it
> will never be used over the desired default route unless the desired
> link
> goes down.
>
> Also how long does it take for a directly connected route and static
> routes
> assoicated with an interface to disappear from the routing tables?
>
> Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9984&t=9979
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
