Ed Nortel was Jackie Gleason's sidekick on "The Honeymooners"
Or maybe it was the top secret bombsite device used in American planes in
WW2?
NSA = no such animal
HTH
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
hal9001
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 12:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
What Nortel or NSA?
Karl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bradley J. Wilson"
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 3:17 AM
Subject: Re: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
> A former employee is groaning over here over that one... ;-)
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 8:57 PM
> Subject: Re: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
>
>
> Shouldn't that now be "Open the pod nortel doors, HAL"?
> Sorry.
> JMcL
> ---------------------- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 28/06/2001
> 09:41 am ---------------------------
>
>
> "Allen May" @groupstudy.com on 28/06/2001 06:35:00 am
>
> Please respond to "Allen May"
>
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
>
>
> Subject: Re: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
>
>
> I dunno. But it makes me think of "Open the pod bay doors HAL".
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jack Nalbandian"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:05 PM
> Subject: RE: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
>
>
> > I know this might veer off topic:
> >
> > Maybe I am biased (and partly curious), mostly due to working at a
> company
> > that actually did refer to its building sub-units as "pods," and
> > subsequently its network subnets (with a scheme pretty much dictated by
> the
> > company campus' physical subdivisions) as "pods," but does the Cisco HQ
> > campus have multiple building "pods" as well? It is an actual term used
> in
> > architecture. Has it perhaps slipped over into being part of Cisco's
> > network terminology?
> >
> > Perhaps this preconception on my part had me thinking of the pods in the
> > BSCN book in this manner. I did notice, perhaps I am wrong, but the
> > individual "pods" in the Cisco book tend to have separate areas (in OSFP
> > scenarios This might seem like a stupid question, but sometimes having
> > english as my
> > >2nd language, makes it more difficult for me to understand what the
> writer
> > >is trying to tell me.
> > >
> > >I am in the middle of my BSCN book, and are now seeing the word POD
> showing
> > >up several times. It tells me that each POD has a number of routers,
and
> > >there are a certain amount of POD's.
> > >
> > >Reading the explanation at http://www.dictionary.com gave me NO answers
> to
> > >this one, and the closest thing I can guess my self to is that POD's
are
> > >kind of departments or subnets, unless the Prince Of Darkness has been
> > >involved with Cisco networks lately :-)
> > >
> > >Thanks for any replies to this one.
> > >
> > >Ole
> > >
> > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > Ole Drews Jensen
> > > Systems Network Manager
> > > CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
> > > RWR Enterprises, Inc.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > http://www.OleDrews.com/CCNP
> > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > NEED A JOB ???
> > > http://www.oledrews.com/job
> > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > ________________________
> >
> > Priscilla Oppenheimer
> > http://www.priscilla.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10279&t=10128
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
