now imagine that you had the async module in slot 5 on a 3662. (big evil grin) actually, the logic behind the numbering scheme is based on the assumption that you could put in a NM-32async into any of the slots in a 3600. therefore, each slot has the potential to contain 32 async ports and then throw in the aux port for the +1. that's why i ended up buying your "easy to configure & predictably slow" 2511. :-) (actually, i needed the slot for a voice module.) oddy > --- Circusnuts wrote: > > Had nothing better to do than sell my easy to > > configure & predictably slow > > 2511 for a 2621 with an NM-16 async module. I am > @ > > a loss as to logic > > involved with the async line numbering. With the > > 2500 Access-Server, line 1 > > is 2001 (2000 being Telnet protocol). My 2621 has > > the NM-16 in slot 1 (as > > seen in the below output): > > > > Firewall#sh diag > > Slot 1: > > Async port adapter, 16 ports > > > > The given formula is this: interface # = (16 x > slot > > #) + unit # +1 > > > > (16x slot # 1) + 1 (physical connection 1) + 1= > > gives me 18 The router > > starts the count @ 33 as the first useable line #. > > So- my range of 16 > > useable > > lines is 33 thru 48. My question is: > > > > What gives ??? > > > > What's the logic here ??? > > > > Thanks !!! > > Phil > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10537&t=10537 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
