Cisco 3640 in a hairpin configuration, with route-caching on, changes the UU bit and the Lucent switch then counts these as DE frames, red frames/octets and FECNs/BECNs. 7200 cisco does not have this problem as it does not change the UU bit. The Ciscos go to a Lucent ATM switch which converts to frame relay. I believe that even though the AAL5 UU bit is supposed to be ignored, but is not when the ATM-to-Frame relay mapping. Even though the UU bit is supposed to be researved/ignorred, cisco 3640 puts a value in there (only) when route-caching is turned on and I believe the Lucent ATM-Frame mapping is misinterpreting the bit. Cisco should not be putting any value in this field, ye there it is....Anybody else have this problem? TIA Marc Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=10414&t=10414 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
