Yeah I mentioned it a few days ago but it's still there.  I'm about to start
filtering this header...argh!

Allen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Holloway" 
To: 
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 1:10 PM
Subject: FW: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not
[7:11522]


> whats the deal,
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 12:21 PM
> To: Paul Holloway
> Subject: DELIVERY FAILURE: User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not listed
> in public Name & Address Book
>
>
> Your message
>
>   Subject: VPN 3015 concentrator question [7:11509]
>
> was not delivered to:
>
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> because:
>
>   User r wilewski (r wilewski@ibmpl) not listed in public Name & Address
> Book
>
> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type message/delivery-status
which
> had a name of ATT00032.dat]
> Reply-To: "Paul Holloway"
> From: "Paul Holloway"
> To:
> Subject: VPN 3015 concentrator question [7:11509]
> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 12:20:37 -0500
> Message-ID:
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
> X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D12ML001/12/M/IBM(Release 5.0.6
>   |December 14, 2000) at 09/07/2001 19:09:08
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
>
> Has anyone had this problem:
>  I have a 3015 concentrator for VPNs. The problem is  when a IPSec client
> connects accross the DSL circuit everything works fine, but when a second
> IPSec client connects, it kicks the first client off. The maximun # of
> concurrent connections is set to 100. Authentication is being handled by
> the
> NT domain database. Any ideas??




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11533&t=11533
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to