Robert,
High availabilty on the sup engine does provide a true physical redundancy.
There is also a high availability option for the MSFC itself that can be
used in conjunction with HSRP. This sets one of the MSFCs as primary and
the other in standby,... but be careful in the catIOS verisions for the MSFC
this is not yet a true physical redundancy, in the integrated IOS I'm told
that HA on the MSFC behaves more like the physical HA on the sup. I would
be careful if you are trying to rely on a single cat for high availabilty
service. I would recommend a single sup in two Cat boxes and run HSRP in
between.
Allen
""Lopez, Robert"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Thomas,
>
> I'm awaiting the delivery of a 6509 w/dual MSFC's and would like to
> configure HSRP and HA between the two. Must HA and HSRP be configured
> simultaneously? It seems from my reading that HA will provide redundancy
> between the supervisor engines and HSRP will provide the routing
redundancy
> between the MSFC's - is this true?
>
> Robert
>
> Network Technician
> Pfizer Global R&D
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Crowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 4:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
>
>
> Yes, I have that configuration at a customer's site that I configured.
(Dual
> MSFC's in a HSRP pair on Cat 6509's) It has been working well. Let me
know
> what your questions are, and maybe I can help.
>
> ______________________________
>
> Thomas Crowe
> Senior Systems Engineer / Architect
> CTS - Atlanta
> Phone: 770-664-3900 ext 45
> Cell: 404-277-4089
> ______________________________
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Lopez, Robert
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 12:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
>
>
> Has anyone configured dual MSFC's on a 6509 with HA, HSRP capabilities
with
> success. I'm reading through this document...
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat6000/sft_6_1/configgd
> /redund.htm#49378
>
> It seems somewhat straight forward. Any opinions
>
>
>
> Robert
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
>
>
> Yeah Jen is staying!!!!!!!
>
> Now could someone please give me some tips on how to take my two 4006
> with RSM and make them as close to redundant as possible. I need to run
> HSRP on the RSM if possible.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jennifer Cribbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 10:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
>
>
> I have worked so hard studying and have loved all the wonderful
> contributions from the people that make this site
> special. But I am not a thief Phil...I really am not. We bought the
> disk..We didn't steal it. We all paid money that we
> had saved so we could study and pass our tests. We had a wonderful
> instructor that cared about us and helped us.
> They had special group studies on varied topics that people could
> participate in if they chose. We had dinners
> together. We were all involved together on a common mission of getting
> through our classes and passing our first cert
> together. I was not trying to implicate anything or anybody.
> Academically,
> it was a great environment and too bad more
> aren't the same and are conductive to learning.
>
> Since those times are past, this group, without it being a formal
> classroom
> is the closest thing I have to college. And
> right now, I am just discouraged...
>
> It is greatly distracting me from what my goals are. I do not mind a
> debate
> but over pertinent issues that matter in the
> long run from a 'cert viewpoint' but this is not one of those issues,
> but it
> is, like I said, very distracting for me from a
> personal standpoint regarding my studying. I have never even read one
> of
> Howards, Priscilla's or Tom's books, but I
> bet they are good. Of course, I am only assuming that based on the
> answers
> I have seen posted by them on this site
> and the 'free' study material compiled by them posted on
> certificationzone.com that is available on a monthly basis that I
> have read. Those people are why I stayed, because you can learn from
> them.
> But I have not stolen anything from
> them Phil as was implied by Wigle.
>
> And you are right..this is ridiculous....I enjoy this site too much for
> one
> Wigle to run me off.
> I guess I will just wait for the dark blue sedan to pull up with all the
> haggling lawyers ....
>
> Jenn
>
>
>
>
>
> 7/9/2001 9:30:48 AM, "Circusnuts" wrote:
>
> >What !!!
> >
> >Now this is ridiculous !!!! Jennifer- unless you're getting hate mail
> the
> >rest us are not seeing, no one else on this list cares.
> >
> >I enjoy you posts & am surprised Kevin has carried things this far...
> >Phil
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Jennifer Cribbs"
> >To:
> >Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 10:18 AM
> >Subject: Re: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
> >
> >
> >> Rational or otherwise, an already convicted thief or not, I have
> withdrawn
> >> my subscription from groupstudy..
> >>
> >> 7/9/2001 8:42:33 AM, "Kevin Wigle" wrote:
> >>
> >> >Jennifer,
> >> >
> >> >I'm not condemning you. I've read your posts and I thought you a
> >rational
> >> >person.
> >> >
> >> >But just read this............
> >> >
> >> >"We couldn't afford it otherwise. None of us. We all copied it to
> >> >use from our school burner. It was registered in
> >> >a co-instructors name. It was all about wanting to pass and
> learning and
> >> >him helping us. Not cheating or pirating.
> >> >Right or wrong, that's what we did. "
> >> >
> >> >Can't get much closer to a confession than that. "We" normally
> includes
> >the
> >> >person talking but I'll let the lawyers haggle that one.
> >> >
> >> >Anyway, think of all the people on this list that make this list
> such a
> >> >great place for learning.
> >> >
> >> >Howard Berkowitz, Author and Instructor
> >> >
> >> >Tom Lisa, Author and Instructor
> >> >
> >> >Priscilla Oppenheimer, Author and Instructor
> >> >
> >> >Not to mention the many CCIE's on the list.
> >> >
> >> >They give their time freely to the list which is as good as it gets.
> >> >
> >> >On the other hand, some people still want to steal from them and
> others.
> >> >
> >> >I just can't seem to reconcile how anybody can steal their work and
> then
> >> >post to a mailing list where they contribute freely. The
> Transcenders
> >are
> >> >not their work but the pricipal is the same.
> >> >
> >> >Like I said, I have used "evaluation" software so I'm not saying I'm
> >above
> >> >the same issues, but I have bought legal copies of anything I found
> to be
> >> >useful. Also, I don't post to a publc place that may unwittingly
> cast
> >> >suspicion on other people.
> >> >
> >> >And just one more thing, if you continue to post to a public email
> list
> >or
> >> >participate in any public endeavor - then you should be prepared to
> have
> >> >people question your actions and for you to defend them. Such
> debates
> >> >normally are not meant to destroy the other person but to gain more
> >insight
> >> >or impart advice/knowledge.
> >> >
> >> >Take this as you will.
> >> >
> >> >Kevin Wigle
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >----- Original Message -----
> >> >From: "Jennifer Cribbs"
> >> >To:
> >> >Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 12:45 AM
> >> >Subject: Re: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> I am not used to being a defender of my actions Kevin. I am
> stopping
> >> >this.
> >> >> We don't feel the same and I do not want
> >> >> to be placed in the positon of having to defend a point in my
> personal
> >> >> history that you disagree with me about. Maybe I
> >> >> shouldn't have said anything, but I am not used to keeping secrets
> >either.
> >> >I
> >> >> am an honest person and it is pointless to
> >> >> continue this. I should not have even replied to your baited
> question.
> >> >> After accusations, answers are pointless, for
> >> >> accusations only breed a heated response, and I am not going to
> get
> >caught
> >> >> up in that.
> >> >>
> >> >> 7/8/2001 11:43:43 PM, Jennifer Cribbs wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Kevin,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I am not saying I am guilty of anything...You are! When you are
> in a
> >> >> semester of school virtually inexperienced in the
> >> >> >computer realm, things happen. I am merely replying to a mail
> that
> >was
> >> >> posted here.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >You think it is a soft piracy ring??...and it will be my fault
> they
> >get
> >> >> caught??...I don't think so Kevin. You are the one
> >> >> >who is wrong. I was the student on a learning quest. And if I
> was
> >wrong
> >> >> and this is the worst thing I ever do, then I
> >> >> >won't worry or lose sleep over it.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >There are so few indescretions in my life that this one just
> kinda
> >sticks
> >> >> out and came to mind...Sorry for the stress my
> >> >> >post caused you.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Jennifer
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >7/8/2001 8:41:46 PM, "Kevin Wigle" wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>In today's litigious world, I'm surprised that anyone would go
> onto a
> >> >> >>respected mailing list and publicly admit that they're guilty of
> >> >software
> >> >> >>piracy and provide enough details to be tracked down.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Then further implicate the school by using their equipment and
> >further
> >> >> >>implicate a "co-instructor" at the school.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>I'm sure it wouldn't take much sleuthing to find the school, the
> >> >> >>co-instructor's name and the entire "ring".
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>I'm not saying I'm lily white but I don't advertise my
> indiscretions
> >to
> >> >the
> >> >> >>world. I'm sure a company like Cisco does not want it to be
> known
> >that
> >> >a
> >> >> >>school allowed (either explicitly or through negligence)
> software
> >piracy
> >> >> had
> >> >> >>anything to do with the academy.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>At the end of the day it is theft, we can all debate the
> problems of
> >> >> >>obtaining affordable training/schooling, but at the end of the
> >debate -
> >> >it
> >> >> >>is theft. The school could be sued, the academy could be
> withdrawn,
> >the
> >> >> >>co-instructor could lose his job and legal expenses could make
> >whatever
> >> >> >>profit you thought you made unavailable for a long time.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Why would you want to tell us about it?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>Kevin Wigle
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>----- Original Message -----
> >> >> >>From: "Jennifer Cribbs"
> >> >> >>To:
> >> >> >>Sent: Sunday, 08 July, 2001 17:42
> >> >> >>Subject: Re: RouterSim 3.0 [7:11342]
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> Personally, I think it's good to help people and there is a
> >difference
> >> >> >>being
> >> >> >>> profiting from someones else's work and
> >> >> >>> helping people trying to learn. When I was in school, all the
> >> >students
> >> >> >>went
> >> >> >>> in together and bought transcender for the
> >> >> >>> ccna. We couldn't afford it otherwise. None of us. We all
> copied
> >it
> >> >to
> >> >> >>> use from our school burner. It was registered in
> >> >> >>> a co-instructors name. It was all about wanting to pass and
> >learning
> >> >and
> >> >> >>> him helping us. Not cheating or pirating.
> >> >> >>> Right or wrong, that's what we did. And I will also add that
> >> >> >>transcender's
> >> >> >>> high points are the excellent explanations at
> >> >> >>> the end of each question. The questions themselves were not
> geared
> >in
> >> >a
> >> >> >>way
> >> >> >>> however to prepare a student for what
> >> >> >>> was coming and the structure of what the real questions were
> about.
> >> >If
> >> >> >>you
> >> >> >>> didn't study the explanations, you might fall
> >> >> >>> into that trap of memorizing and not learning.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> People will probably disagree with me also...
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> Jennifer Cribbs.
> >> >> >>> [been there, done that]
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> 7/8/2001 2:46:10 PM, "PHIMHONGKONG" wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> >contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] i have router sim 2.1 and
> switch
> >sim +
> >> >> >>ccno
> >> >> >>> >sim
> >> >> >>> >i can burn you one
> >> >> >>> >:-d
> >> >> >>> >i dont sell pirate software . i am helping you to study :-)
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> >poeple please dont say i am pirater
> >> >> >>> >
> >> >> >>> > wrote in message
> >> >> >>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> >> >>> >> Hi to all,
> >> >> >>> >> For anybody who own a RouterSim 3.0. I am planning to
> invest
> >> >$250.00
> >> >> >>> >buying
> >> >> >>> >> RouterSim 3.0 router simulator to preopare for my CCNA
> >> >certification.
> >> >> >>Can
> >> >> >>> >I
> >> >> >>> >> burn a copy of this as my back-up? Can I simultaneously
> install
> >> >this
> >> >> to
> >> >> >>> >two
> >> >> >>> >> hard drives (i.e, to a desk top and to a lap top)?
> >> >> >>> >> Please educate me.
> >> >> >>> >>
> >> >> >>> >> Thanks,
> >> >> >>> >> Val
> >> >> >>> Have a great day!!
> >> >> >>> Jennifer
> >> >> >Have a great day!!
> >> >> >Jennifer
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Have a great day!!
> >> >> Jennifer
> >> Have a great day!!
> >> Jennifer
> Have a great day!!
> Jennifer
>
> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a
name
> of Thomas Crowe.vcf]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=11689&t=11684
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
