I don't believe this guy will actually implement this configuration. I think
he just wants to know if it is theoretically possible.
CM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony van Ree [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 12 July 2001 06:56
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Access-list Question [7:12043]
>
>
> Hi,
>
> You have one in and one out. It would seem a bit strange
> blocking and/or
> allowing the same stuff in both directions however. Also if
> you were to
> monitor your access-list 100 it would not be able to identify
> which way the
> data came from easily.
>
> Just a thought
>
> Teunis,
> Hobart, Tasmania
> Australia
>
> On Wednesday, July 11, 2001 at 08:12:38 PM, Washington Rico wrote:
>
> > Is it true that you can have only one access-list per direction per
> > interface. If so the below configuration be correct or incorrect.
> >
> > Thank you for your input.
> >
> > interface BRI0/0:1
> > description Connection Segment
> > bandwidth 64
> > ip address X.X.X.X 255.255.255.240
> > ip access-group 100 in
> > ip access-group 100 out
> > no ip directed-broadcast
> > encapsulation ppp
> > no keepalive
> > no cdp enable
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> ___________
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.
--
www.tasmail.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12095&t=12043
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
