Yes, at the next reload but not until then. But.....if you have frame-relay
maps, you don't need to in-arp for the address anymore.
Thank you,
MikeN
""Sasa Milic"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> And then static map will kill InARP, wouldn't it ?
>
> Sasa
>
>
> Marc Russell wrote:
> >
> > You don't need a routing protocol to ping a directly connected neighbor
ip
> > address on the same subnet. Inverse arp should of taken care of the
layer-2
> > to layer-3 mapping. As for your own interface add a frame map command
for
> > your own interface and it will work.
> >
> > Marc Russell
> > www.ccbootcamp.com
> >
> > ""Ray Smith"" wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > I was doing one of the frame relay labs from Hutnik's CCIE lab books
and
> > did
> > > not understand the following:-
> > >
> > > 1. Why is it that I could only ping from Router-A to Router-B and
> > > vice-versa, but can not ping their own interfaces?
> > >
> > > 2. Why is the routing protocol (RIP in this case) configured on
Router-A
> > but
> > > not on Router-B, yet I was still able to ping accross end-to-end?
> > >
> > > Can someone out there explain this to me? Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > Ray
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=12754&t=12632
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
