This issue has nothing to do with the synchronization rule. If you had a
third router that could inject some external routes (and hence run external
BGP) then these two routers would pass routes to each other.
With the network statement you are specifically attempting to originate
those routes. In that case, the originating router must have an IGP route
to the prefix before it will originate the route. Once you add the static
route, this fulfills the requirement and your prefixes are advertised.
HTH (and I hope it's correct ),
John
| I have 2 routers in my lab running IBGP, both of them list the other
router
| as a neighbor. I have turned off synchronization on both routers, and
the
| way I understood it, if this is off the router will automatically
advertise
| anything that is in a network statement under router bgp. I can't seem
to
| get them to advertise the networks to each other without putting in
static
| routes. Am I misunderstanding something here? As soon as I put in
routes
| for the networks I get the advertisements no problem, thanks for any help
| you can give.
|
|
|
|
_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13310&t=13304
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
