At 09:53 PM 7/23/01, Sammi wrote:
>Thanks for the config sample, and thank you all for the input.
>
>I'm drawn to 802.1Q, although I can't really give exact reasons.
>During the transition I will have a few 1900

I don't think the 1900s support 802.1q!? That will be your first problem.

Priscilla

>and a couple of 2800
>switches in the network and it seems I'll have less trouble with the
>802.1Q.
>
>On 23 Jul 2001 15:39:43 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Ed Horley") wrote:
>
> >The switches you have support both ISL and Dot1Q if you are running the
> >enterprise code, not sure for the standard stuff.  For a sample config:
> >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/43.html
> >
> >Hope that helps.
> >
> >
> >""Arun""  wrote in message
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> Hi
> >> ISL is cisco stuff ......if ur network is all cisco you can use ISL in
> >that
> >> but if it involves other switches or in near future u see this thing use
> >> Dot.1Q.This is for the equipment ..and for the performance thing which
one
> >> is better i thing somebody more experienced can help u on this .
> >>
> >> regards
> >> Arun Sharma
> >> ""Sammi""  wrote in message
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >> > I'm not clear on which standard I should use for VLAN setup.
> >> > I will be using a 2948G-L3 as a core switch. Connected to the core
> >> > will be a number of 2948xl as access switches. The majority of these
> >> > access ports will connect directly to end stations, though some will
> >> > connect to other 2948s (via fiber and via wireless) which then will
> >> > connect to end stations.
> >> >
> >> > Does this last fact mean I must use ISL so as to implement trunking?
________________________

Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13447&t=13325
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to