Even though it's fairly uncommon to see companies running RIP, this is a
pretty cool new tool.  I'm disappointed that the people on the CCIE list
wouldn't think it was pretty nifty.  Since all of us are bound to run
into somebody running RIP eventually, it would be good to be aware of
these sorts of new features.

Besides, it seems possible that when the lab is updated they make
include commands from 12.1.  If so, this feature might get you a few
points.  You never know...

Thanks,
John

>>> "Chuck Larrieu"  7/24/01 9:08:23 PM >>>
I posted the following to the CCIE list and received no comment
whatsoever.
apparently if a topic isn't directly related to any of the practice
labs, or
is not perceived as being necessary to pass the Lab, no one is
interested.

since I know the folks on this list like to learn things, I thought I'd
post
here

-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:10 PM
To: CCIE_Lab Groupstudy List
Subject: IP Summary-address RIP


ran into this one while digging around CCO

IP summary-address rip network mask

this command is new to IOS 12.1

it is an interface command, and ip split-horizon must be disabled for
it to
work.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_c

/ipcprt2/1cdrip.htm#xtocid1773719
watch the word wrap

>From CCO:

Example 1: Correct Configuration

The following example shows how the ip summary-address rip command
works
with autosummary addressing in RIP. In the example, the major network
is
10.0.0.0. The summary address 10.2.0.0 overrides the autosummary
address of
10.0.0.0, so that 10.2.0.0 is advertised out interface e1 and 10.0.0.0
is
not advertised.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
 Note   If split horizon is enabled, neither autosummary nor interface
summary addresses (those configured with the ip summary-address rip
command)
are advertised.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
router rip
router int e1
 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
 (config-if)# ip summary-address rip 10.2.0.0 255.255.0.0
no ip split-horizon

router rip
network 10.0.0.0

[end of CCO quote]

finally got this one to work. the doc CD omits the requirement that
the
sender must be a RIPv2 speaker. which makes sense, if you stop and
think
about it. sample configs below my signature.

I got to wondering about the no ip split-horizon requirement on the
interface where the summary takes place. if the RIP process receives
the
summarization information from an interface, then I guess it considers
advertising that summary back out that address as a violation of split
horizon. make sense? I can't think of any other reason for the
requirement.

leads to some interesting possibilities. for example, suppose you have
some
kind of RLAN private network, with lots of home user DSL lines
aggregated
into an ATM DS3 at the core. you want to conserve address space by
allocating /29's to the home office users, but your RIP network
requires a
mask of /24.

don't laugh, guys, I have a customer with exactly this situation :->

you can advertise a /24 summary into your rip network. Cisco routers
by
default listen to RIPv2 advertisements, even if they are RIPv1 routers.
So
the RIPv2 advertisements will be accepted and placed into the routing
table.
I don't know if this is true with other vendor's products.

there are obviously some pitfalls. with split horizon disabled, one
must be
aware of the implications. I have not yet tried various flavors of
route
maps or distribute lists to limit what goes out. also, one must take
care
that the RIPv1 routers are able to readvertise the summarized route.
Assuming, as in the case I have mentioned, the RIPv1 router has only
/24's
on its attached interfaces, this should be OK. just something to be
aware
of.

in terms of CCIE lab applicability, I suppose this can be one more tool
in
your arsenal. but only if your pod features 12.1 or better.

Chuck

interface Loopback0
 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.248
!
interface Loopback1
 ip address 10.1.1.9 255.255.255.248
!
interface Loopback2
 ip address 10.1.1.17 255.255.255.248
!
interface Loopback3
 ip address 10.1.1.25 255.255.255.248
!
interface Loopback4
 ip address 10.1.1.33 255.255.255.248
!
interface Ethernet0
 ip address 190.190.99.3 255.255.255.0
 no ip split-horizon
 ip summary-address rip 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0

interface Serial1
 ip address 190.190.23.3 255.255.255.0
 no ip split-horizon
 ip summary-address rip 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
 clockrate 2000000
!
router rip
 version 2
 passive-interface Loopback0
 passive-interface Loopback1
 passive-interface Loopback2
 passive-interface Loopback3
 passive-interface Loopback4
 network 10.0.0.0
 network 190.190.0.0
 no auto-summary

another router:

I    171.171.0.0/16 [100/9076] via 190.190.23.3, 00:01:10, Serial1
S    100.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Serial1
     190.190.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
C       190.190.23.0 is directly connected, Serial1
I       190.190.99.0 [100/8576] via 190.190.23.3, 00:01:10, Serial1
     10.0.0.0/16 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R       10.1.0.0 [120/1] via 190.190.23.3, 00:00:03, Serial1

note the summarized route 10.1.0.0/16 ( from serial 1 above )

another router:

C    171.171.0.0/16 is directly connected, Loopback0
     190.190.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
I       190.190.23.0 [100/8576] via 190.190.99.3, 00:01:09, Ethernet0
C       190.190.99.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
     10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R       10.1.1.0 [120/1] via 190.190.99.3, 00:00:22, Ethernet0

note the summarized route as a /24 ( from the ethernet interface above
)




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13759&t=13699
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to