hi ejay..

sunet calc wont calc wild mask or does it?

Best Regards
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 12:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: access list.. [7:13564]
> 
> 
> No, Solution2 is correct. 
> The objective was to permit x.x.240-255.0-255 per the 
> original message :
> >What mask would be used if you want to create an
> >access list where the IP addresses (128.252.0.0 to
> >128.252.240.0) would be blocked
> >pls support with explanation,
> 
> You can check it with the subnet calculator from B0s0n Software.
> 
> -ejay
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 2:23 PM
> To: 'Hire, Ejay'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: access list.. [7:13564]
> 
> 
> solution2; will permit 1-240 range and the deny statement 
> will deny the rest
> thats opposite....
> 
> to get a wild mask
> we put higher minus lower
> 
>  255.255.255.255
>  255.255.240. 0
>    0      0    15   255
> 
> so the router will permit 1-240 instead....
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hire, Ejay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 9:22 PM
> To: 'Farhan Ahmed'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: access list.. [7:13564]
> 
> 
> Objective:  
> Create an Access list to block the source address range 128.252.0.0 to
> 128.252.240.0
> 
> Solution 1:
> access-list 1 deny 128.252.0.0    0.0.127.255 Blocks 
> 128.252.0-127.0-255
> access-list 1 deny 128.252.128.0  0.0.63.255  Blocks 
> 128.252.128-191.0-255
> access-list 1 deny 128.252.192.0  0.0.31.255  Blocks 
> 128.252.192-223.0-255
> access-list 1 deny 128.252.224.0  0.0.15.255  Blocks 
> 128.252.224-239.0-255
> access-list 1 permit any                     Allows all other 
> traffic to
> pass.
> 
> Solution 2:
> access-list 1 permit 128.252.240.0 0.0.15.255 Permits 
> 128.252.240-255.0-255
> access-list 1 deny 128.252.0.0 0.0.255.255 Denies traffic 
> from 128.252 that
> is not permitted by the previous line
> access-list 1 permit any
> 
> Notes:
> Both Solutions work, but solution 2 has less lines and will 
> result in less
> processor utilization in most scenarios.
> 
> -Ejay
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farhan Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 2:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: access list.. [7:13564]
> 
> 
> What mask would be used if you want to create an
> access list where the IP addresses (128.252.0.0 to
> 128.252.240.0) would be blocked
> pls support with explanation,

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which
had a name of Farhan Ahmed.vcf]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=13835&t=13564
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to