I currently run NAT on a 2000 Server...
One interface is using an auto ip address that is received from the ISP...
The other Nic, is linked to my switch and to my router stack...
What I would like to do is take one of my routers, and configure nat on it.
This will replace the 2000 server. I dont need advice on the server end, I
have that well taken care of, what I am trying to come up with is a way to
have one interface of my router to accept a dynamic IP address, and to work
nat on that router, the dynamic interface being the outside interface, or
public interface....
Yea, I know about the Linksys router as well, and almost went ahead and
bought it, was trying to figure out how to make it do something it probobly
cant.
You know, one of those I wonder if????? deals... thats all.
----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Ramsey
To: ;
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: Probobly a stupid question.... [7:14273]
You mean 2000 servers accessing the internet via dynamic nat? Or you have
2000 static translations inbound? And when you say "server interface" do
you mean the ethernet interface on the router that the servers are beihind?
Set up maybe like a DMZ?
I mean, you can certainly set up your DSL connection to be established and
pull an ip address automagically if that is what your isp supports.
Give us a little bit more detail on your goals.
-Patrick
>>> "Guy Russell" 07/30/01 05:47PM >>>
Is it possible to set up NAT on a router for DSL, allowing the DSL side
connection to receive a DHCP generated address??
I have been running 2000 server Nat, and using my DSL connection with no
problems, but would like to remove the server interface completely...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14282&t=14273
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
