a bit redundant, but also see http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/133/3.html re
X.25

and
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/cable/cab_rout/cfig_nts/3794
m8tx/3794over.htm#11858 for an X.21 table

Neither should be confused with "Racer X" of Speed Racer fame whose top
speed still remains a mystery....

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 2:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: X.25 interface maximum rate [7:14146]


Do you want to know about X.25 (your subject) or X.21 (your text)?

I don't believe there is a theoretical maximum for X.25 - this has been
discussed before, though, so try checking the archives.
X.21 will run with no problems at 2 Mbps.  We have lots of X.21 interfaces
running at 2 Mbps in our network.
However, it does depend on what hardware you're using - see for example
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/core/cis7505/interpro/instal
l/ipicgfsp.htm#xtocid88350
which describes limitations on the total bandwidth an FSIP can cope with.

JMcL

---------------------- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 31/07/2001
03:35 pm ---------------------------


"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" @groupstudy.com on
30/07/2001 09:37:03 pm

Please respond to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Sent by:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:


Subject:  X.25 interface maximum rate [7:14146]


Hello Group,

Can somebody tell me the maximum speed an X.21 interface can suport or
a URL that has detail information on this. I have an X.21 interface
connection to a 2MB link and it would flap after about 48hrs of
operation with a lot of input, CRC errors.

A Bit Error Rate test has been performed on the link and the link
quality was confirmed to be good.

Please help!!!

Regards,


Preye.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14334&t=14146
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to