What exactly in the NetWare cluster caused it to loose connection...
Just for our knowledge..

thx,
Santosh

""Don Oxman""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Thanks to all who replied.
>
> The problem seems to be coming from our NetWare 5 cluster, and I think
we've
> resolved the problem.  Now if I could only convince them to get rid of
> NetWare....
>
>
>
> > > I must admit this is my first question posted to the group, though
I've
> >been
> > > a lurker for a long time.  Here it is:
> > >
> > > We have workstations on 10 different floors (each floor divided in
half,
> > > each half a different subnet), all connected to 5505's (20 in total).
> >From
> > > the 5505's fiber goes to a 6509, then ultimately to the WAN via ATM.
> >The
> > > servers all plug into the 6509.  So far, so good.
> > >
> > > For the past 3 days we have had workstations (not all, but about
50%)on
> > > every floor lose connectivity to the network, whereby all of our NT
and
> > > NetWare servers are unavailable and web browsing is gone.  This has
> >happened
> > > a total of 6 times, and there doesn't appear to be a pattern to the
time
> >or
> > > network utilization.  Most times the users have to reboot, though
> >sometimes
> > > they can reconnect without a reboot.
> > >
> > > Can anyone help steer me in the right direction?  Our WAN guys can't
> >help,
> > > and I have a feeling that it's going to be up to me to figure this one
> >out.
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot.
> > >
> > > --Don
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> >http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=14569&t=14562
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to