People call it the Customer Engagement Feature (CEF)! ;-) I don't have any
actual experience with it though, I must admit.
Priscilla
At 04:56 PM 8/13/01, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
>I've seen comments along those lines over on the NANOG group, if that means
>anything ;->
>
>Chuck
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Schneider, Matt
>Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:43 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]
>
>
>are you saying that CEF is buggy?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Scott M. Trieste [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 2:11 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: load balance between 4 T1s [7:15692]
>
>
>If your running this implementation with an ISP, chances are they won't use
>a technology that has proved buggy: CEF. My recommendation would be to use
>the load balancing feature of such IGP routing protocols like OSPF or EIGRP.
>
>""khramov"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I am getting 4 T1s but I think I will have only one IP address. How can
> > I load balance 1IP between 4 T1s.
> > thanks
________________________
Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=15957&t=15692
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
