In my experience with Worldcom , you might have trouble choosing your own
DLCI numbers.  You are likely to get assigned arbritrary numbers starting at
100+.  I have found it helps to assign the subinterface the same as the DLCI
number, it really helps in troubleshooting when you do a show frame pvc and
you can look at the subif's and know immediately what circuit it is. May not
be as helpful when you have 3 circuits, but it helps more as the number of
pvc's increase.  You can then put the office branch number in as a
description.  

-Patrick

On Tue, 14 Aug 2001 12:03:08 -0400, Ole Drews Jensen wrote:

>  Thanks for your input Steve.
>   
>  Have a great day,
>   
>  Ole
>  
>  
>  
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
>   Ole Drews Jensen 
>   Systems Network Manager 
>   CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I 
>   RWR Enterprises, Inc. 
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
>    http://www.RouterChief.com 
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
>   NEED A JOB ??? 
>    http://www.oledrews.com/job 
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
>  
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Steve Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>  Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:44 AM
>  To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Subject: RE: Designing FR for 3 branches [7:16030]
>  
>  
>  
>  I think you are going down the right track. I always try to have a
coalition
>  between my DLCI and my IP. We have a good sized frame network and man
does
>  it help do be able to say " Oh, location 1 is DLCI 101 with Wan IP
x.x.x.x"
>  This type planning will also help out when you grow and try to track it
all.
>  
>  I use /30 on all my wan connections but I also figure out hw many nodes
on
>  each locating then provision 10-20% over that depending on the locations
>  potential. Seems to work great for me.
>  
>  Steve 
>  
>  -----Original Message----- 
>  From: Ole Drews Jensen [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
>  Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 10:16 AM 
>  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>  Subject: Designing FR for 3 branches [7:16030] 
>  
>  
>  Good morning, 
>  
>  I have now passed several Cisco exams, and are in a lucky situation where
I 
>  have to establish Frame Relay connections between our main office and
three 
>  of our branch offices. 
>  
>  It will not be fully meshed, but a PVC between the main office and each 
>  branch office. 
>  
>  Since I've come accross much of this during my studies, I would like to
show
>  
>  you my draft, and hope that some of you will throw some comments back to
me,
>  
>  whether or not it's a good design or a bad design. 
>  
>  Our branch offices each have a branch code, and the three branch offices
I 
>  am connecting has 1, 7 and 8. 
>  
>  I have planned on buying a 2610 with a WIC-1DSU-T1= for the main office,
and
>  
>  1720's with WIC-1DSU-T1='s for the branches. The main office will be
768/384
>  
>  (bw/cir) and the branches 256/128. 
>  
>  My LAN at the main office is 10.0.0.0 / 8 (total overkill, but that's how
it
>  
>  was, and that has been fine with me so far). 
>  
>  If we take branch office 1, the setup I have drafted looks like this: 
>  
>          2610    - Ethernet 0    : 10.1.1.9 / 8 
>          2610    - Serial 0.1    : 172.16.1.1 / 30 
>          1720    - Serial 0              : 172.16.1.2 / 30 
>          1720    - FastEthernet 0        : 172.16.1.129 / 25 
>  
>  ### QUESTION 1 ### 
>  
>  Would this be the best way of using VLSM for hierarchical design? 
>  
>  ################## 
>  
>  Next, I would like to match the branch office number with as much as 
>  possible, so my idea was to skip subinterface 0.2 thru 0.6 on the 2610,
so 
>  the next branch office setup would look like this: 
>  
>          2610    - Ethernet 0    : 10.1.1.9 / 8 
>          2610    - Serial 0.7    : 172.16.7.1 / 30 
>          1720    - Serial 0              : 172.16.7.2 / 30 
>          1720    - FastEthernet 0        : 172.16.7.129 / 25 
>  
>  ### QUESTION 2 ### 
>  
>  Would that be a good idea, and if no - then why not? 
>  
>  ################## 
>  
>  At last, I would like to see if I can match the DLCI also, but I think
that 
>  I recall 16 being the lowest number to use (is that correct?). 
>  
>  Therefore, the branch office connections would have DLCI 1, 7 and 8 or
21, 
>  27 and 28 if 16 is the lowest. 
>  
>  ### QUESTION 3 ### 
>  
>  Is this a good idea, and if no - then why not? 
>  
>  ################## 
>  
>  I appreciate any comments on this, and hope that you can help me learn
the 
>  "no-so-much-documented" areas of study guides, so I can design this Frame

>  Relay the right way from the beginning. 
>  
>  Thanks in advance, 
>  
>  Ole 
>  
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
>   Ole Drews Jensen 
>   Systems Network Manager 
>   CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I 
>   RWR Enterprises, Inc. 
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
>    http://www.RouterChief.com 
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
>   NEED A JOB ??? 
>    http://www.oledrews.com/job 
>  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16088&t=16030
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to