Putting static routes on the remote routers pointing back to the hub router would work. Assuming the hub router has routes in it's routing table to all the remote routers. Darrin Gibson -----Original Message----- From: Wayne Wenthin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]) [7:16702] To me this looks very similar to bridging with DSL. Since you cannot receive the ARP the router must proxy this. At 09:52 AM 8/21/2001, McCallum, Robert wrote: >you can correct me here if I am wrong but split horizon is only used in >distance vector protocols???? NO??? > >The problem here without giving the answer is that a router is expected to >pass a packet out of an interface which is on its own subnet !! Doesn't >compute! What is the routing protocol being used to route ip?? This is >where the answer will lye > >-----Original Message----- >From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: 21 August 2001 17:06 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]) >[7:16681] > > >I don't think bridge will work on this network because of split horizon. > > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Brian" >To: >Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 7:51 AM >Subject: CHALLENGE PROBLEM (was Re: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]) [7:16659] > > > > On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Cisco Lover wrote: > > > > > Hi Guys.. > > > > > > Come with some New Queston.. > > > > hmm, ok, so your looking for some challenging questions? Ok, I will post > > one, its got FR in it. First I'll post the problem, followed by the > > config: > > > > THE PROBLEM > > =========== > > Users on DLCI's 200, 224, 201, 225 cannot communicate to eachother. They > > can talk just fine to the rest of the network, but no packets can pass > > between them. Later discovery reveals that so long as they are on > > different layer 3 network addressing, communcation can occur, but if they > > are on the same network, such as 192.168.3.0, then they cannot communicate > > > > What is the problem? I will reply to let everyone know who got the > > correct answer. > > > > Below is the configuration: > > > > ! > > version 11.3 > > ! > > interface Ethernet2/0 > > ip address 192.168.1.242 255.255.255.0 > > ! > > interface Serial4/0 > > no ip address > > encapsulation frame-relay IETF > > keepalive 15 > > frame-relay map bridge 200 broadcast IETF > > frame-relay map bridge 224 broadcast IETF > > frame-relay map bridge 201 broadcast IETF > > frame-relay map bridge 225 broadcast IETF > > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > > bridge-group 1 > > ! > > interface BVI1 > > ip address 192.168.3.242 255.255.255.0 secondary > > ip address 192.168.2.242 255.255.255.0 > > > > ! > > router igrp 1 > > network 192.1.0.0 > > network 192.2.0.0 > > network 193.3.0.0 > > ! > > ip classless > > ! > > bridge irb > > bridge 1 protocol ieee > > bridge 1 route ip > > ! > > > > > > > > > > For eg, > > > our FR switch is setup for Full mesh,But out network is setup as Hub & > > Spoke > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------- > > I'm buying / selling used CISCO gear!! > > email me for a quote > > > > Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036 Scarlett Parria > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 318-213-4709 318-213-4701 > > > > Netjam, LLC http://www.netjam.net > > 333 Texas St. VISA/MC/AMEX/COD > > Suite 1401 30 day warranty > > Shreveport, LA 71101 Cisco Channel Partner > > toll free: 866-2NETJAM > > phone: 318-212-0245 > > fax: 318-212-0246 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16707&t=16707 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
