John,

Thanks a lot for this detailed reply..BUT

Actually my main point of interest is

".  If you want to base this on a total
byte count of 10,000 bytes"

I mean what should be the Value of bandwidth we need to consider for 
different port .
I Can see in FAT Kid scenerios that he is considering total bandwidth as 
64Kbps when dealing with FR(and diving this as per traffic),but on the other 
hand when dealing with normal serial line he is considering this factor 
actual to 32Kbps.????

This is my real confusion???

Thanks for ur help Again :)

>From: John Neiberger 
>To: Cisco Lover 
>CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: A Custom Queuing Question [7:17622]
>Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 21:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Cisco's explanation of custom queueing is about as clear as the mud in my
>front yard right now.  I'll try to simplify this is a way that makes sense.
>
>With CQ, you define different types of traffic and then assign them a
>certain byte count based on how much weight you want to give that traffic.
>The total byte count of all queues is somewhat arbitrary in many cases, but
>your choices can have unforseen results.
>
>Let's use an example and it will be more clear.  Let's say you have three
>types of traffic:  One that is *really* important, another that is almost 
>as
>important, and then a bunch of other traffic that isn't as important.  You
>arbitrarily decide that you want the highest priority traffic to get 50% of
>the bandwidth.  The next higher priority traffic gets 25%.  The rest of the
>traffic gets a measly 25% during periods of congestion.
>
>Now you need to know some basic math.  :-)  We have to convert these
>percentages to some sort of byte count.  If you want to base this on a 
>total
>byte count of 10,000 bytes, your figures look like this:
>
>First queue:  50% of 10,000 = 5,000
>Second queue:  25% of 10,000 = 2,500
>Default queue:  25% of 10,000 = 2,500
>
>This will roughly ( and I mean *roughly*) get you the percentages you
>desire, but this is greatly affected by the frame size.  In CQ, a queue
>doesn't break up a frame and will queue up an entire frame before moving on
>to the next queue.
>
>For example, if you already have 4,800 bytes in the first queue and another
>1500 byte frame comes in for that queue, all 1500 bytes will go into the
>queue before the queue is emptied.  This can seriously mess up your
>percentages so take that into consideration.
>
>If you're using smaller frames it might be a good idea to use a smaller
>total byte count.  For instance, if you're doing a lot of VoIP and for some
>strange reason decide to use CQ (LLQ is better) then you'd definitely want
>to use smaller queue sizes to avoid jitter and delay.
>
>For traffic not senstive to minor latency or one high speed links you can
>feel safer using larger queue sizes.
>
>Does that help?  If not, please let me know and I'll try to be more clear.
>And if I've made any mistakes, someone please correct me.  It's past my
>bedtime and I'm dozing off.  :-)
>
>Regards,
>John
>
>
>|  Hi Friends,
>|
>|  Can any one here please explain what should be the"bandwidth Value" if 
>we
>
>|  need to divide traffic by percentage ,using Custom queuing.
>|
>|  As far as I know(IF Im right )during our lab,as we usually take clock as
>|  64Kbps,then we need to divide this factor (64/8) among the traffic.
>|
>|  What about others????I m still confused..
>|
>|  Hey!!!!!!!!Can you please solve my confusion.,.....(examples preffered 
>:)
>|
>|
>|  Thanks.
>|
>|  _________________________________________________________________
>|  Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
>http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>|
>|
>|
>|
>_______________________________________________________
>Send a cool gift with your E-Card
>http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
>
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17626&t=17622
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to