I agree TOTALLY with Leigh Anne, but I would also like to add that I was
very disappointed at how many questions on the CCIE written were word for
word on testing software. One is a coincidence about forty exact word for
word questions is criminal. So even if someone posts a question with QID and
vendor info you could still be treading thin ice. I think the software
copied the Test questions, cisco didn't look at the software and say we
gotta have that one.
Don
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leigh Anne Chisholm"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:20 PM
Subject: RE: ambiguous command [7:17568]
> If someone replies to a question indicating they can't respond due to NDA,
> it's more than likely that that person has it on good authority that the
> question comes from an official Cisco exam. It's best if people didn't
jump
> to responding to such questions until the poster identifies the source of
> the question.
>
> In this particular example, two people posted messages indicating
answering
> would contravene NDA. Groupstudy has never been about providing a home
for
> braindumps - it's been about enhansing knowledge. "Jo Carol" needs to
keep
> questions OFF the list unless the source has been specified--and the rest
of
> us need to take the time to make sure we're not contributing to devaluing
> the worth of our Certifications.
>
>
> -- Leigh Anne
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> James Willard
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ambiguous command [7:17568]
>
>
> That isn't a NDA issue. That's something you can easily test on any
> router that runs IOS. A quick test of telneting to a router and typing
> "show i" results in the "ambiguous command" message followed by the
> Router# prompt. There's your answer.
>
> James Willard
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> "Wright, Jeremy" wrote:
> >
> > Can't answer- must respect NDA
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jo carol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:08 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: ambiguous command [7:17568]
> >
> > Hi
> > I had a question on a test that said if after a command
> you
> > get
> > %ambiguous command will the router return to the
original
> > command or
> > just router#
> > Thanks
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --
>
> -James Donavon Willard ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17675&t=17568
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
