ROFL...yes...well....I didn't have an answer so I had to admit all else
failed. I almost felt I lost my manlihood. I had the sudden urge to ask
directions on the way home. Maybe it's all the rain we're getting that's
depressing me to the point of RTFMing ;)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dennis H"
To:
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: pix outbound vs acl [7:18101]
> What?!? Are you suggesting there is useful information and maybe even the
> answer to the question...................................... in the
> manual???
>
>
>
> ""Allen May"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Well in the 5.1 PIX users manual it has a note in the section on
outbound
> > saying it's been superceded with the access-list command. It's in the
> > command reference section. It says the recommend migrating outbound
> command
> > statements to access-list command statements to "maintain future
> > compatibility". Sounds like a hint of possibly removing it just like
they
> > keep hinting they're going to do with conduit commands.
> >
> > Allen
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "BOURNE, KENNETH"
> > To:
> > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:47 AM
> > Subject: pix outbound vs acl [7:18101]
> >
> >
> > > Is there nay benefit to using ACL over outbound? Both accomplish the
> same
> > > end result for me .
> > >
> > > |Ken Bourne,CCNA|Network Specialist|
> > > |702-657-3432(direct)|702-524 1193(mobile)||[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18129&t=18101
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
