Yep this is a large range of udp ports but I can't see a way round that

cheers
""Peter Slow""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Slow
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:46 PM
> To: 'Patrick Donlon'
> Subject: RE: H323/VoIP info [7:18451]
>
>
> but what about the RTP streams? the pix has always been able to do h323
> filtering / fixup protocol for the h323 stuff. i've never gotten voip to
> work thru a PIX with out leaving an enormous hole for a static NAT
> translation or for UDP port mapping w/tcp 1719&1720
> -Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Donlon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: H323/VoIP info [7:18451]
>
>
> For those of you with an interest in VoIP and H323, the PIX 525 with
version
> 5.3(2) does work with static NAT (and no NAT).
>
> cheers Pat




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18571&t=18451
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to