With ping, delay is actually measured. The router reports how long it takes
to get replies.
EIGRP delay is not dynamically measured. Delay of each interface is
inversely proportional to the configured interface bandwidth. Total delay
for an EIGRP route is a sum of each interface delay, as reported in EIGRP
Updates.
If you want EIGRP's delay to be somewhat more realistic, you can tweak the
interface bandwidth.
Priscilla
At 02:06 PM 9/24/01, TP wrote:
>Group,
>what is the relation (if any) between the total delay I see in sh ip eigrp
>topology and the total delay I see in a simple ping?
>
> From show eigrp topology I see total delay associated to a point-to-point
atm
>pvc lower than total delay showed for a E1 hdlc (between the same routers, 1
>hop).
>If a make an extended ping I experience a lower delay with E1 than pvc atm
>(and, to be honest, this is what I'd like to see)
>
>
>Thanks in advace,
>Teresa
________________________
Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20936&t=20926
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
