Based on my experience, a typical LD (Local Director)
topology is:

Internet -- Firewall -- Switch (any VLAN) --
-- Local Director (VIP) -- Hub/switch -- servers

VIP = virtual IP for all servers

Virtually no configurations are needed on the
hub/switch except port speed/duplex.  The hub
basically just is bridging all the traffic between LD
and servers.

J. Li

--- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
 wrote:
> A typical physical topology for a Local Director is
> as follow:
> 
> Clients->Hub or Switch(Vlan1)->LocalDirector->Hub or
> Switch(Vlan2)->Real
> Servers
> 
> However, instead of using two Physically separate
> switches for the distinct
> VLANs, what if I patch the LocalDirector into ports
> 5/1 and 5/2 on my
> Cat5500 switch, with port 5/1 being on VLAN1 and 5/2
> being on VLAN2?  This
> seems like virtually an identical topology as the
> example shown above
> however there is one problem that I am predicting:
> 
> Of course, all inbound AND outbound traffic directed
> to the Virtual IP of
> the LocalDirector MUST flow through it.
> 
> The problem is that I have an RSM router on my
> CAT5500 switch and since I
> have established two interfaces on it: interface
> VLAN1 and VLAN2, what
> would keep the traffic originating from my Real
> Servers and destined back
> to the clients from bypassing the VLAN2 switch port
> which is the
> LocalDirector and instead get routed straight across
> to VLAN1 where the
> traffic will go out directly back to the originating
> client?
> 
> John Squeo
> Technical Specialist
> Papa John's Corporation
> (502) 261-4035
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone.
http://phone.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21690&t=21589
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to