Hello Mohan , Thanks a lot for you input. Hve u implemented the secenario, that i have put up, anywhere ?
Thanks & Regards, Vijendra. ----- Original Message ----- From: Mohan To: Vijendra Jaiswal Cc: Cisco (E-mail) Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:49 AM Subject: RE: To Multiplex n X 64 Kpbs ckts and terminating on the outer( [7:22049] > Hi, the answer is NO. you don't need a MUX at your end as long as your > interface is channelised E1 capable. you just need to configure the > timeslots on the router. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vijendra Jaiswal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: To Multiplex n X 64 Kpbs ckts and terminating on the Router( > [7:22049] > > > Hello , > Secnario : To Multiplex n X 64 Kpbs ckts and terminating on the > outer( Channelized PRI Port) > Instead of having the ckts terminated on Copper Pair the leased ckts should > be terminated on a 2Mbps stream(1 stream of STM-1 OFC equippment) ) which is > then connected to a channelized PRI port of 3660 router. > A multiplexer is being placed at the TELCO to multiplex the n X64 Kbps ckts > Here is my question now :--- > After placing the multiplexer at the TELCO , do i have to place another > multiplexer at my end too ? Or i can directly terminate the o/p of the > multiplexer, coming on the 2Mbps stream , to the channelized port of the > 3660 Router ? > Pls let me know abt the same. > Thanks > Vijendra. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=22203&t=22203 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
