Yep, didn't think of CEF. Probably is. Change CEF to per-packet and you should be fine plus you'll save some CPU cycles.
--- "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > Good point, but if it's the wrong MIB object it's > something very similar to > the correct one, because the figures make sense, and > are accurate when > compared to show int. Show int also shows > discrepancies between the > interfaces. > Rebooting the router, or dropping the lines, just to > check this is not an > option (it's not exactly a big problem), but it will > be rebooted this > weekend anyway so I'll see if that makes a > difference. > Somebody offline suggested that it is CEF defaulting > to per-destination > sharing which I think may be the culprit - I haven't > looked it up yet but I > think cef is disabled by default in 11.2 but enabled > by default in 12.1. > show int stat shows that some (not all) packets are > being route-cached on > that interface on the 12.1 router but not the 11.2 > router. > Thanks for the suggestions, > JMcL > ----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on > 24/10/2001 02:12 pm ----- > > > "Erick > B." > > cc: > Sent by: Subject: > RE: fast switching > [7:23969] > > nobody@groups > > tudy.com > > > > > > 24/10/2001 > 01:15 > pm > > Please > respond > to > "Erick > B." > > > > > > > > > Jenny, > > Are you sure MRTG is polling the right MIBs? I'm not > really familiar with SNMP monitoring of cisco > routers > and MIBs involved, but 11.2 and 12.1 are big > difference in versions. Chances are between 11.2 and > 12.1 some MIB objects changed. > > Clearing the counters, and doing 'show int' on both > interfaces might show they are indeed somewhat > balanced. # of packets output close to same on each > int, etc. > > HTH... > > --- Rik Guyler wrote: > > Gosh Jenny, I don't have a clue but in the past > I've > > had to reboot equipment > > at times to make a few rare changes take full > effect > > so maybe you're > > correct. How much pain is involved in rebooting > it? > > > > Rik > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 9:07 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: fast switching [7:23969] > > > > > > Something odd is happening on my network... (not > > that that's unusual...) > > > > I have a couple of 7507s connected by two E1 > links. > > For various reasons, > > the links are set up with fast switching disabled > > (mainly because there are > > single sessions with enough traffic to flood a > > single link). The 7507 on > > one side is running IOS 11.2. Last weekend the > 7507 > > on the other side was > > upgraded to 12.1(10). According to 'show ip int', > > fast switching and flow > > switching are disabled (on both links at both > ends). > > However, MRTG shows > > that the traffic from the 12.1 router to the 11.2 > > router is not balanced > > evenly across the two links. Traffic from the > 11.2 > > router to the 12.1 > > router is balanced. > > > > Any guesses as to why this is so? Bug (surely > not, > > this is Cisco...:-)? Is > > a reboot or shut/no shut required to change > > switching states (I didn't do > > the upgrade myself and I'm not sure what exact > > configuration sequence was > > used)? Something really obvious I'm missing here? > > > > Ta, > > JMcL > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. > http://personals.yahoo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals. http://personals.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=23994&t=23969 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
