Go and buy that second sup!! If you read your post you answer your own question!!
Dave "Thomas N." wrote: > > Hi Group, > > I have this scenario and wonder if it is possible to setup the topology with > redundancy. I have a CAT 6509 acting as the core switch (say switch A), > and 2 other CAT 6506 acting as the distribution switches (say switch B and > C). Both switch B and C have fiber uplinks to core switch A. Switches A > and B also have a redundant fiber between them. Regarding the hardware, The > core 6509 has 2 supervisor engines with dual MSFCs. The two 6506 have only > one supervisor engine and their MSFC DO NOT do routing at all. > > My concern/question is that if the supervisor engine of one of the > distribution 6506 died, can access switches attached to this 6506 re-route > to the redundant link? I doubt this will work because the the supervisor > engine of the 6506 has all the configuration (including vlans) for the > ports/trunks attached to access switches died. Is there any way to to set > them up so that if the supervisor engine on one distribution 6506 dies, all > ports/trunks on this 6506 can still be OK with redundant link? Putting dual > supervisor engines on each 6506 will be my last solution. Thanks All! > > Thomas N. -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=25055&t=25055 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
