"[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Ouellette)" wrote: > From what I see it, it looks like per destination load balancing where > I thought with no ip route-cache turned ont hat it would be per packet > load balancing? I think I figured it out last night but from the > initial setup I thought i'd see one ping go over s0 and the next for > s1 and so on. > > TIm Hi Tim, You are right. I should read more carefully. I would have expected per-packet load balancing with fast switching disabled. Are you positive it's disabled on all interfaces?
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=25951&t=25787 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
