That is very correct. The pix is more a NAT box than anything (sorry if this offends anyone).
-- Kevin Welch -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Michael J. Doherty Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX [7:28083] The PIX has limited routing capabilities (in order to allow packets through the firewall). It cannot route packets out the same interface that it arrived on. If it does not have a route to a host on another interface, it will drop the packet. (my understanding, anyway, feel free to correct an inaccuracies). Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "BASSOLE Rock" To: Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:03 Subject: PIX [7:28083] > Hi group, > > > I'am using a PIX with 2 interfaces (inside and outside). > > -Security level for the inside interface is 100. > -Security level for the outside interface is 0. > > Is it possible to use the PIX to route a specific host installed on the > outside interface towards another subnet (still on the outside interface)? > > Will the packet be droped because the host is on the outside interface? > > Regards, > > Rock BASSOLE > Til: +33 (0) 1 45 96 22 03 _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28097&t=28083 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
