Yes, in a larger environment, you can use confederation and then use RR within the confederation.
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >It's my understanding that route reflectors are used in small > >networks,confederations are used in larger networks. > > If anything, at least in the ISP context, it's probably more the > other way around. Remember also that you can build hierarchies of > route reflector clusters. > > ISPs, as opposed to enterprises, tend not to have a lot of internal > policies about what can go where. They also make increasing use of > MPLS in their cores coordinated with BGP at the edge. > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Bob Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:32 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: OT: BGP confeds versus RouteReflectors > > > > > >Folks, > > > >Anyone have any real-world pro's/con's for BGP confeds versus > >RouteReflectors. It seems that routereflectors are easier to configure, > >but I was not sure of the actual technical reasons to have 2 > >technologies that seem to address the same problem. > > > >Thanks, > >Bob Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28141&t=28137 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
