Well, think about it this way.  You have a test with 26
questions.
You get a

============================================================
===
Section 1: 100%
Section 2: 33%
Section 3: 33%

Final Score: 85%
============================================================
===

It doesn't make much since until you consider what they
don't tell you.
Section 1: 20 questions
Section 2: 3 questions
Section 3: 3 questions

so,

(1*20) + (0.33*3) + (0.33*3) = 22
22/26 = 84.6%

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 6:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Passed CCIE Written [7:28772]


For a long time now I had ignored the Cisco scoring pattern,
the bottom line
is that you passed. When I was writing my CCNP/CCDP series,
I discover that
in 2 of the papers I got on each 2 100%, a few 30-something
% and an
embarasing 0% but the final score read 80-something %, close
to 90%. From
that time I start ignoring their scoring system, Cisco need
to re-write
their scoring algorithm.

Congrats, on to the big moster.

Regards.
Oletu

----- Original Message -----
From: Derek Gaff
To:
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:32 PM
Subject: Passed CCIE Written [7:28772]


> Passed CCIE Written today, Was not a bit impressed with my
score, got 71%
> with
> a pass score of 70%. Just scraped the bucket with this
one. Although I
can't
> understand there scoring method. I got 100% in 3 items,
80% in 2 and
between
> 50 and 70% in the rest. :-)
>
> Anyway, a pass is a pass no matter what the score is.
Thanks for all the
> information and thoughts.
>
> Cheers Derek
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28832&t=28772
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to