Today I was driving home and I saw a truck that had imprinted on it "I5 Exit 24." (I5 is a major highway in this part of the world.)
I said to myself, "hey that truck is label-switched!" (Turns out, on closer inspection, that it also had an advertisement that had partially worn off. Presumably the I5 Exit 24 was related to the enterprise being advertised, not routing info for the truck!?) I thought it was funny..... Priscilla At 10:03 PM 12/13/01, Angel Leiva wrote: >Rob, > >If your network environment is IP based, and if MPLS support is on your >backbone's growth path, you'll be better off using OSPF now. > >On top of that, OSPF offers faster convergence time, and is Industry >Standards compliant (allowing your company to use non-cisco gear as well, >i.e. Juniper/Foundry/others, unless your company wants to remain a cisco >"shop"). > >So, from a routing protocol stand point, you shouldn't have interoperability >issues using OSPF. > >My 2 cents, hth, > >Angel > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >Mears, Rob >Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:54 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: OSPF or EIGRP [7:28966] > > >Hi all, > >We are in the middle of building out a new ATM network for the Core and on >the outside we are going to be running about 80 3640 or 2600. We are in a >big debate about the routing protocol, we are currently EIGRP. > >I have collected lots of info off Cisco's Web site about the two but wanted >to hear it from the Engineers in the trenches. >What's your take on it? If it were you what would you run (EIGRP, OSPF) and >why? > > > >Thanks >Rob ________________________ Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29158&t=29158 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
