When using secondary IP addresses, IGRP seems to ignore one of the addresses but I can't tell how it chooses which one to ignore. A few nights ago I configured this and it ignored the secondary. Tonight when I did it it ignored the primary and used the secondary for updates.
Odd, and the end result was that the IGRP-only router would not have a complete routing table. When I use tunnels or frame relay subinterfaces it seems to work correctly. John ________________________________________________ Get your own "800" number Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag ---- On Sat, 15 Dec 2001, Gregg Malcolm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Thought we were down for the count tonite. Good to see a few new > messages. > John, by stability w/ secondaries did you mean re-loads? My config is > working fine w/ secondaries on the tunnels even after I reload. I'll > admit > that the routing table is a little strange tho. IGRP only router has > IGRP > routes w/ both /27 and /28 masks as well as a directly connected route > to > get to the OSPF only router via the tunnel. > > Gregg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29279&t=29279 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
