Cisco 6x3 are supporting SDSL (2B1Q Line Coding).

Cisco 827 are supporting ADSL and G.SHDSL (PC-TAM Line C.)

Cisco 1720 ????

SDSL is a vendor propetary technoligy, g.shdsl is normed by the itu. More
information about
g.shdsl on www.shdsl.org.

g.shdsl and sdsl is normaly delivert over the local loop (normaly cat.3
cable in europe) from your provider.

Typical sdsl vendors are lucent, efficent networks, .....

As lan interface all cpe's gives u a 10 tp or 10/100 tp interface.


 -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
Von:    [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Gesendet:       Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2001 15:46
An:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff:        RE: AW: SDSL [7:29464]

Thanks for the reply by the way!

Read that a few minutes ago too... 

The equipment I've found now that maybe would to the trick is:

SDSL: Cisco 673 (SDSL + 10/100 tp)

ADSL: CISCO 827 (ADSL over POTS + 10/100 tp) 
or maybe a 1720 with a WIC-1ADSL interface card.

Am I missing something or do you think this could be right?

My best regards!
Johan EricssonJoachim Bdr wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> no the cisco 800 series supports g.shdsl but not sdsl. 
> Sdsl has an outher line coding and it isn't a standard like
> g.shdsl.
> 
> Best regards
> J. Baer
>  -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Gesendet:     Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2001 13:51
> An:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff:      SDSL [7:29464]
> 
> Hi!
> 
> My company is considering using DSL for communication.
> My knowledge in this area is somewhat minimal :)
> 
> I have found the cisco 633 that supports sdsl.
> 
> But I really need something that can do both sdsl, hdsl, vdsl
> and adsl.
> Cisco 800-series seems to support adsl at least, my question
> is if the 800 also can do sdsl? 
> 
> Best regards, Johan Ericsson




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29490&t=29464
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to