Greetings all,

I found the solution last night to our problem.  All the routers in the
drawing below are peering with each other,  I failed to mention
yesterday that rtrA and rtr B are not directly connected.  The way these
routers knew about each others routes was via iBGP, which made bgp think
there was a loop somewhere (recursive routes).  By adding static routes
and making sure these routers knew about each other via static routes,
resolved the issue.  Another way of identifying recursive routing was
the bgp table refresh, every 60 seconds.


HTH ........Nabil


----- Forwarded by Nabil Fares/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/20/2001 10:42 AM -----
                                                                                       
                     
                    Nabil
Fares
                                         To:    
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                    12/19/2001          
cc:
                    11:07 AM             Subject:     BGP
Help
                                                                                       
                     
                                                                                       
                     



Greetings all,

I was wondering if you guys can help out with this problem.  We're
connected to both Sprint and UUnet and receiving full routes.  All
routers are peering with each other.  My problem is with both RTRA and
RTRB, they're flapping constantly, RTRC and RTRD are very stable.  Is
there a knowing cause am missing here?  any suggestions would be great.


Thanks.....................Nabil





RTR A- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RTRB
     |                   |
     |                   |
     |                   |
     |                   |
RTRC                     RTRD
Sprint                          UUNET




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29785&t=29785
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to