going through Parkhurst. 1.4 aggregate-address net mask attribute-map route-map name
1.5 aggregate-address net mask route-map name no difference. So what's the point? BTW the CCO command and configurations guides aren't a lot of help here. The command reference is quite sparse, in fact, when it comes to the switches available to the aggregate-address command. There is some slightly better information available on the TAC pages. Ever wonder about code bloat? I gather this is a god example of how it can happen. Today's BGP lesson - what can and cannot be used with the aggregate-address command. using either form - attribute-map route-map OR route-map - one can use the following set comands: community ( and all related switches ) extcommunity ( and all related switches - although I haven't a clue what this does - have not researched it yet ) local-preference ( used only within the same AS ) metric ( suggestion to a neighbor only, the neighbor does not forward it ) origin ( transitive - forwarded from originating router into eternity, so to speak ) weight ( local router only ) someone a while back had a question about commands that show up with the ? - this is a perfect example of not all commands having any effect in all situations, even if they do show up with the "help" I keep wishing someone would do a good book or white paper on route-maps... Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30162&t=30162 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
