This may be too simple an answer, but is the interface S0 on router A up? Router A won't pass the route unless the interface is up.
Also, why do you have "ip summary-address eigrp 1 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0" command on an interface that has EIGRP deactivited via the passive interface comamnd. In addition, the summary address command doesn't summarize anything in this case. Maybe I'm just consfused. Can you post configs and route tables from both routers? Marc Russell www.ccbootcamp.com ""Raymond Cai"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > I got a simple question on eigrp summary address. > > here is the senario: > > Serial0-----RouterA--Serial1--------------------Serial0--RouterB > 172.16.1.1/24 172.16.25.1/24 172.16.25.2/24 > > RouterA: > > router eigrp 1 > passive-interface s1 > network 172.16.0.0 > no auto-summary > > router igrp 1 > passive-interface s0 > network 172.16.0.0 > > int s1 > ip summary-address eigrp 1 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 > > My question is : How come on routerB , I cannot see the route to 172.16.1.0 > , it only shows 172.16.0.0 as connected. > > This example is from Jeff Doyle's page 382. it shows the 172.16.1.0/24 can > be redistributed into igrp . > > Your suggestion is greatly appreciated. > > Raymond Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30472&t=30439 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
