Cisco Cisco You leave me with a quandry little man.
It's very easy to filter you straight in to junk e-mail, but... Receiving your posts cheers me up. Life is good at the moment, very good, but no matter how bad things could get in the future, I don't think I could become as bitter and twisted as you. Life has obviously not dealt you a good hand, but the lucky ones amongst us can enjoy the poetic justice that you've probably got what you deserve. Happy New Year! Gaz (Not anonymous - In fact I hope to meet you one day - for a laugh!) ""Cisco Cisco"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Here is a little wit and wisdom. There isn't enough > RFCs or books in the world to help you pass the CCIE > lab. We will be waiting for your third "I failed the > CCIE lab AGAIN" e-mail. > > BTW... Your New Year's resolution should be to > consider minding your own business. > > > ""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote: > > > Speaking only for myself, I look forward to your wit > and wisdom when > > providing us wannabees with the knowledge we so > desperately seek. > > > > While you're at it, can you provide us with a list > of the RFC's you have > > written? And the books? I'd like to check them out. > Anything to improve my > > own understanding of how things work. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Chuck > > > > > > ""Cisco Cisco"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Howard, > > > If you actually worked on a router in the real > world > > > rather than just tell people you do, you would > know > > > that Cisco has supported access-list remarks for > some > > > time now. > > > > > > Oh I'm sure you're going to reply to this e-mail > with > > > some stupid story like, "This reminds me when I > was > > > talking to a developer at Apple about Mac OS 1.0 > but I > > > had never really worked on an Apple" or some > worthless > > > story like that. > > > > > > Also do us all a favor and quit cross posting from > > > other mailing list. We don't want to see your > replies > > > to the juniper and ccie mailing list posts. Cross > > > posting can be dangerous when you're on some of > the > > > list the you are on.... wink, wink ;-) > > > > > > > > > ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote: > > > > > > > >Yes, it does make simple tasks a little more > > > complicated. However, using > > > > >inverse masking can make complex tasks much > easier. > > > > > > > > > >Take this issue. Say you are asked to filter > access > > > to all odd 192.168.x.0 > > > > >/24 routes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Your method. > > > > > > > > > >192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 > > > > >192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 > > > > >192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 > > > > >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > > > > > > > > > > > I see your approach, Marc, and I have even > > > encountered real-world > > > > situations where such filtering might be > > > appropriate. It happened > > > > when an enterprise wanted to "leave room for > > > expansion", but didn't > > > > understand summarization. They assigned > > > odd-numbered subnets to > > > > different sites/areas, thinking the even ones > would > > > be for future use. > > > > > > > > My approach, incidentally, is to figure out the > > > number of potential > > > > areas or sites, then divide by a power of 2, at > > > least 4, to be > > > > summarization-friendly. > > > > > > > > There's no question that your approach takes > fewer > > > lines of code. > > > > Personally, I wouldn't use it except in a huge > > > network where there > > > > was no other way to fit that many lines into > NVRAM. > > > > > > > > My motivation for not doing so is > maintainability. > > > The more complex > > > > the mask, the more difficult it will be for some > > > subsequent > > > > administrator to figure out what was being done. > I > > > might be more > > > > open to the idea if Cisco saved comments with > the > > > configuration, but, > > > > of course, it doesn't. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Send your FREE holiday greetings online! > > > http://greetings.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Send your FREE holiday greetings online! > http://greetings.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30615&t=30597 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
